13-09-2018, 05:15 PM
(13-09-2018, 04:19 PM)Jerry1237 Wrote:(11-09-2018, 07:12 PM)REMBrum Wrote: Evening,
I've attached an attempt at the question- any comments, pointers or feedback would be very welcome.
I would welcome anyone unfamiliar with this incident to give their view on whether I have defined the incident well enough in part a) of the question (regardless of their experience).
Many thanks.
Hello
Lots of good points raised but without the question, difficult to be specific in commenting.
The root causes could be considered for the circuitry not being in place to prevent the signal being put back. However, the signaller made an error and was it actually human factors, i.e. workload, that caused the first error which was compounded by the lack of circuitry. Also, how familiar was the Bobby with the 'box and was this lack of approach locking normal for their 'box or 'boxes?
One comment, in C it was written "route causes" where "root" was meant.
Jerry
Many thanks Jerry,
I've attached the relevant question paper for reference and any other interest parties.
I did indeed mean root, not route.