Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2016 Exam Review- March 2017
#4
So, could part of the feedback be careful consideration of who is considered suitable for mentorship then? Agree with the committee a 100% pass rate is unacceptable and a to return to a norm is good but not what was aimed for and the non-pass rates seem to high still!

Should we encourage the language thing to be put to bed or at least to be formally reviewed/ratified? Based on the review comments I see, those who struggle do so at the most basic levels; lack of domain knowledge, reading the questions, sufficient preparation etc. A certain SW UK based group is a, and not the only, good example of what is needed to pass and what structured application does to candidates.
Le coureur
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by PJW - 27-03-2017, 08:18 PM
RE: 2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by Jerry1237 - 28-03-2017, 06:36 AM
RE: 2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by PJW - 28-03-2017, 10:53 AM
RE: 2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by Jerry1237 - 28-03-2017, 11:44 AM
RE: 2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by PJW - 28-03-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: 2016 Exam Review- March 2017 - by Jerry1237 - 31-03-2017, 11:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)