27-09-2016, 06:39 PM
(13-02-2012, 07:48 PM)PJW Wrote: I have now had my attempt at the points and the remaining routes; indeed I did a "bonus extra" as I had space on the sheet and seemed useful to demonstrate a few things; not recommended exam technique though!
You'll notice that I have slightly changed my approach as gained some experience in use of this format; in particular decided the best way to use the space to show signal disengaging / last wheel replacement etc.
Also took some of the short-cuts that you might do within exam conditions, rather than always listing all tracks properly within the route locking etc.
No doubt I have made an error or two; don't be shy in pointing them out. My excuse is that I was really doing to show the use of the format!
(06-02-2012, 08:37 PM)PJW Wrote: I have had my first attempt to use the IRSE's format introduced for the 2011 examination and apparently to be retained for future years for those who wish to use it.
Note that the layout is filed as an attachment on Answer to 2003 Part A Q2 thread
Hi, PJW, thanks for your demonstration on using the new IRSE format.
regarding to the 114 Routes, I have the questions below, hope you still have good memory on them.
1. 114C(M)
Is there any need to also set 211N for flank protection?
2. 114C(W)
Why the time for approach locking release can be reduced compared with 114C(M)? Is it due to the lower aspect level and thus lower approaching speed and thus less time for approach locking release?
3. 114C©
May I ask why 110A(M) is included in opposing route? Also, is there reason for omitting CLR condition and approach locking condition for Call-on route?
Thank you very much and it's such a fruitful revision time with studying your attempts.
Cheers,
Lokko