Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2011 CT Attempts
#2
Hi Arnut

A good set of control tables which should do well.

Overall, most of the conditions have been well handled.

best wishes

Reuben

Some quick comments:

Route 216A(M)

opposing route locking applied by route 327A(M) should also require FZ sectional overlap locking free

timing to a stand on FH / GF tracks is a little long. My "rule of thumb" is track length (metres) / 10 + 10s, giving approx 20s in this case.

(BT or 137R) also needed in track circuits, as it is foul of the overlap via 139R

The FY aspect is not permitted to 212 with JI position 1 - see route tables.

references to 212 should also specify Left and Right aspects of 212 Banner repeater.

222 is not a controlled signal, so cannot be said to be ARAFOAL

348C(M)

does not require137N - does not provide flank protection

323A(M) does not exist - not a stop signal.

should instead require single line release 321 N

Also requires route 343A(M) Normal (directly opposing overlap)

FP should also be in the lookback tracks

Approach locking timer could reduce to 60s

349D©

should also require 135N (flank)?

your track clear conditions are for a main class route

buffer stop lights are not controlled or lamp proved, so cannot be referred to as a "signal ahead aspect"

133 points

N-R should require (FJ or 132R) - foul track

R-N should not require FJ clear - in the N alignment FJ is "in line" not foul

should be set N by 347B(M) - flank protection

It looks like you have interpreted route 346C(M) to be routed via 146R, 133R - this is an odd choice given that there is a straighter option via 146N , 133N - the table of routes indicates no alternative routes so I would expect this would be the one and only option.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2011 CT Attempts - by asrisaku - 23-07-2014, 03:09 AM
RE: 2011 CT Attempts - by reuben - 05-08-2014, 07:46 PM
RE: 2011 CT Attempts - by asrisaku - 07-08-2014, 11:33 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)