Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt
#12
(20-04-2014, 07:46 AM)asrisaku Wrote: Dear Guys

216A(M)
I don't understand opposing routes. Why don't we need 327A(M), 327B(M) and 343A(M)?
I saw overlap sharing on FZ. Could u explain why? I am confused.

Thanks in advance.

Best wishes, Arnut
In the case of 216A(M) up to 212, 212 has two possible overlaps (via 139 N or R), so a given overlap may not be available by the fact that a route is set up to 349 with the overlap on FZ, but that would not prevent 216A(M) being set with the overlap from 212 through 139N.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by alexkwan - 28-09-2012, 03:07 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by reuben - 28-09-2012, 05:21 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by reuben - 01-10-2012, 08:57 AM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by reuben - 02-10-2012, 12:26 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by PJW - 02-10-2012, 03:45 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by PJW - 03-10-2012, 08:46 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by taxcel - 17-08-2013, 12:19 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by PJW - 17-08-2013, 12:53 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by Peter - 20-04-2014, 08:39 PM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by Peter - 21-04-2014, 11:18 AM
RE: 2011 Mod 3 Control Table attempt - by Peter - 22-04-2014, 07:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)