20-04-2014, 08:39 PM
(20-04-2014, 07:46 AM)asrisaku Wrote: Dear GuysIn the case of 216A(M) up to 212, 212 has two possible overlaps (via 139 N or R), so a given overlap may not be available by the fact that a route is set up to 349 with the overlap on FZ, but that would not prevent 216A(M) being set with the overlap from 212 through 139N.
216A(M)
I don't understand opposing routes. Why don't we need 327A(M), 327B(M) and 343A(M)?
I saw overlap sharing on FZ. Could u explain why? I am confused.
Thanks in advance.
Best wishes, Arnut

