03-11-2011, 09:54 AM
There is nothing wrong with not using lineside equipment but the fact that in-cab signalling or ATC is being employed needs to be stated clearly.
(01-11-2011, 08:20 AM)onestrangeday Wrote: Hi PJW:
Thanks for taking time to review my work and it gives me great help. Be honest, my signalling experience is only limited to ‘High Class Level’ of signalling equipment, that is ATC (so virtually there is no lineside signal installed on the wayside) and high speed rail signalling system which is high costly build compare to ‘normal’ signalling system. So I am poor at considering about other real-life Signalling System that has been used in conventional railway line, but I wish I can broaden my view on the railway system as a whole.
Attached jpg file is the updated version of single line layout which I have done. The suggestion you gave I’ll try later to see how it goes.
Thanks
william
(31-10-2011, 11:43 PM)PJW Wrote: OK sorry- I see now that you had put the question in with your answer.
Looking at your signalling, there are some inconsistencies and you have rather too many signals overall.......
I suggest you should draw a graph of the timetable. ....
Le coureur

