13-08-2011, 12:16 PM
Re 137 CT
I think the problem was not so much with what was there, rather than for the items missed. To be fair, it is a complicated layout and I do wonder whether it exceeds what it should be expected from a student in an exam, but that's the paper and you must do your best with it.
There were some surprising omissions. Whereas you listed 465C, you didn't include 461C or 463C which look the more obvious.
The biggest omission was you regularly failed to get all the flank- for example 137A provides flank for moves over 138B normal.
So 471A, 474D, 471C, 473B, 472D, 472E ........
You also didn't see that 137B are trailing points in the overlap beyond 473 (an arguably 471 but I'd state the assumption that no swinging overlap provided here), so 455B
I think the problem was not so much with what was there, rather than for the items missed. To be fair, it is a complicated layout and I do wonder whether it exceeds what it should be expected from a student in an exam, but that's the paper and you must do your best with it.
There were some surprising omissions. Whereas you listed 465C, you didn't include 461C or 463C which look the more obvious.
The biggest omission was you regularly failed to get all the flank- for example 137A provides flank for moves over 138B normal.
So 471A, 474D, 471C, 473B, 472D, 472E ........
You also didn't see that 137B are trailing points in the overlap beyond 473 (an arguably 471 but I'd state the assumption that no swinging overlap provided here), so 455B
(12-08-2011, 01:43 PM)SARVESH KUMAR Wrote:(11-08-2011, 10:04 PM)Peter Wrote:(11-08-2011, 08:50 AM)SARVESH KUMAR Wrote: Sir,
Please check my point control table of IRSE 2010 for point no. 137 & 148
WITH REGARDS
SARVESH KUMAR
Your post says about 137 and 148, but the attachment only has 148.......
Hope this helps.
Peter
thanks sir
from
sarvesh kumar
(12-08-2011, 10:27 AM)Peter Wrote: Ah, I think I have now found your other post for 137.
I have now moved it to here and will hopefully someone will be able to look at this shortly.
Note that I have already put comments on 148 here.
thanks sir
from
sarvesh kumar
PJW

