(19-09-2010, 07:02 AM)greensky52 Wrote: I have tried on 1998's route CT& Point CT. Welcome commet, especially from PJW~~ Exam is coming, I would like to make sure whether the formats are appropriate or not, and the biggest problem for me now. Thanks
I feel that layout and questions of this year are much easier than 200Xs', although I am not sure how about my works.
I'll put it on the list, but to be honest I have a lot to look at and very little time at present- will be on a course away from home probably without acess to email most of next week. Seems like many people are realising how close the exams now are !!
I am afraid that I don't understand what you meant when state:
I am not sure how about my works.
Looking briefly at headings only:
Points CT seems fine, although I question value of the specific swinging O/L columns given how much likely to be used.
Route CTs.
The point requirements -the "N or R" column is that for the facing points in overlap, with the majority of points being "Set, locked and detected"- you have filled in content the other way!
The route locking heading should sya "until" whereas it toolks like "unit"
The first of the Approach Locking columns should be "Imposed when sig clears AND TC occupied.
The first two columns under the "until" are read together as the sequence and the joining word in the column for TC occ should be "AFTER" rather than "OR"
PJW