Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My Attempt at 2004 CTs Table Format
#7
(09-09-2010, 08:47 PM)Alasdair Wrote: Thanks Peter,

Excellent advice, and I had spent ages trying to figure out what ARAFOAL stood for - now I know.

Alasdair

Mainly a Britih Rail "Western Region" term
At Red And Free Of Approach Locking
though in SSI data it is just
foal = free of approach locking
but actually means exactly the same as approach locking does require the signal to be proved controlled to red (i.e. aspect relays requiroing a red, but not necessarily proved alight). The thing is in RRI the relay itself must be down proved to make sure it has responded correctly whereas wheter SSI drives a lamp electronically (i.e. not interfaced via a relay) then there is no such need as computers don't fail like that- if there is a fault then it is detected and the TFM shuts down its output interface- which means that a red is illuminated by a diverse path anyway and so therefore it is not an issue
PJW
Reply


Messages In This Thread
My Attempt at 2004 CTs Table Format - by Alasdair - 07-09-2010, 01:38 PM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by priyman - 08-09-2010, 11:29 AM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by PJW - 08-09-2010, 12:42 PM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by Alasdair - 08-09-2010, 09:24 PM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by PJW - 09-09-2010, 09:50 AM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by Alasdair - 09-09-2010, 08:47 PM
RE: My Attempt at 2004 CTs - by PJW - 09-09-2010, 09:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)