Just back from weekend, it is so appreciate that you gave so detailed explanation for all of my questions. Forgiving me as a new man in signalling discipline... I need some time to comprehend all your explanations completely, and I think I also need to discuss these with my colleague, helping me understand all the meanings you mentioned. Thank you again... Later I will discuss with you if there is still something confused.
Furthermore, referring to your answer of point211, item 2: I do not think 212 is trailing point in overlap of 142, because 142's overlap is EK, but 212 is in EL. Do you think EK and EL both are overlaps of 142?...
As you mentioned above, I attach my attempt on Point 203 & 211, which were finished last week, before getting your explanation...so there were still some errors we juse discussed, please do not mind...
[quote='PJW' pid='1630' dateline='1276335367']
211 Item 2
The general issue re estimating distances on these sketches;
a) they are not to scale
b) there is certain definite info (inter signal distances),
c) there are
Furthermore, referring to your answer of point211, item 2: I do not think 212 is trailing point in overlap of 142, because 142's overlap is EK, but 212 is in EL. Do you think EK and EL both are overlaps of 142?...
As you mentioned above, I attach my attempt on Point 203 & 211, which were finished last week, before getting your explanation...so there were still some errors we juse discussed, please do not mind...
[quote='PJW' pid='1630' dateline='1276335367']
211 Item 2
The general issue re estimating distances on these sketches;
a) they are not to scale
b) there is certain definite info (inter signal distances),
c) there are