Posts: 46
Threads: 27
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation:
0
Job Role: Other
Hi All,
Please could anyone provide feedback for the calculation section of the 2013 mod 2 paper.
Regards
TF
Posts: 55
Threads: 24
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Job Role: Project Engineer
Afternoon TF,
The question paper for 2013 asks you to:
"Determine the minimum braking distances for the permissible speeds and braking characteristics of the traffic specified on layout 1". You've only detailed the headway braking distance.
I used a table to record all the permissible line speed braking distances using the same calculations you've applied to get the headway minimum braking. You don't necessarily have to demonstrate the working out each time for each line speed, just perhaps once so that you demonstrate the underpinning maths.
Your uniform minimum signal spacing will therefore be different for the branch and main lines and will be based on the permissible line speed braking distance rather than headway braking.
You might want to consider a simple diagram for the HT3 and HT4 calculations to show how the BSOL applies. The principles of the HT3 and HT4 calculations looks fine, however the minimum spacing should be PSR based rather than headway based.
I've attached the paper and layout for anyones reference.
Hope that helps
Posts: 55
Threads: 24
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Job Role: Project Engineer
Hi TF,
The top line speed for this layout is 160km/h for non stopping passenger trains, rather than the 140km/h for the headway speed.
Part 1A of the paper is asking you to work out the braking distances for all of the line speeds detailed on the layout, i.e:
Non stop passenger trains 160km/h
Stopping passenger trains 100km/h
Freight trains – main line and branch line 100km/h
Your principles look sound, but you need to use the minimum spacing distances based on the highest permissible line speed.
This is why a table might help as it can let you show your detail quite simply and make sure you don't miss anything out.
Once you've calculated the braking distances in question 1A, you can then use the minimum spacing to help you work out the 3 and 4 aspect headways for part 1B.
Posts: 335
Threads: 68
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
3
Job Role: Signalling Designer
I think there are probably marks for showing how you derive the 3 & 4 aspect headway formulae rather than just quoting them. It's quick enough to draw a diagram to illustrate this.
Posts: 55
Threads: 24
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
0
Job Role: Project Engineer
Morning,
Looking at the response to question 1C, firstly I'd say check the diagram you've given- always good to give a diagram, but the question asks you to consider a stopping service leaving the down loop (rather than the down main). I don't think this affects the calcs in this instance.
Your calculations to understand the speed to reach linespeed for the stopped service look correct. The remaining calculations for the distance to the branch protecting signal and the linespeed calculations also look good (obviously the actual answer would be slightly different due to the signal distances, but your principles are sound).
My only other comment would be that you've added a 30 second dwell time when adding the overall time for the stopping train to reach linespeed and clear the branch protecting signal overlap. You could consider driver reaction time here for the driver to notice the proceed signal (approx. 5 seconds), but I'd say there's no need to consider a full dwell time- the question paper asks you to consider the headway following the departure of the stopping service only.
Good stuff, keep going!